<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Yet Another Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Difference Between Serif and Sans-serif Fonts</title>
		<link>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/general/difference-between-serif-and-sans-serif-fonts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/general/difference-between-serif-and-sans-serif-fonts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[font]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t know this, but I just noticed on w3schools.com.

On computer screens, sans-serif fonts are considered easier to read than   serif fonts.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know this, but I just noticed on <a title="W3Schools" href="http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_font.asp" target="_blank">w3schools.com</a>.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Serif and Sans-serif" src="http://www.w3schools.com/css/serif.gif" alt="Serif and Sans-serif" width="398" height="142" /></p>
<p>On computer screens, sans-serif fonts are considered easier to read than   serif fonts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/general/difference-between-serif-and-sans-serif-fonts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>26 gigapixel photo of Dresden</title>
		<link>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/photography/26-gigapixel-photo-of-dresden/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/photography/26-gigapixel-photo-of-dresden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dresden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megapixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No it&#8217;s no type, it&#8217;s really a photo of 26 gigapixels which is 297.500 by 87.500 pixels! In photography we are getting used to standards around 20 megapixels or higher and now a photo like this is passing by. A.F.B. Media from Germany has presented this by putting 1655 photo&#8217;s of the city of Dresden [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it&#8217;s no type, it&#8217;s really a photo of 26 gigapixels which is 297.500 by 87.500 pixels! In photography we are getting used to standards around 20 megapixels or higher and now a photo like this is passing by. A.F.B. Media from Germany has presented this by putting 1655 photo&#8217;s of the city of Dresden together.</p>
<p>The complete photo <a title="26 gigapixel photo of Dresden" href="http://www.dresden-26-gigapixels.com/dresden26GP" target="_blank">is now on the online</a> and can be viewed with a nice viewer.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="371" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0VfeGLxUlU0" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="371" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0VfeGLxUlU0"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/photography/26-gigapixel-photo-of-dresden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snail timelapse</title>
		<link>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/film/snail-timelapse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/film/snail-timelapse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timelapse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the Internet I found this interesting movie. Normally when we see snails on the ground or something we see like one frame of their whole life. We can&#8217;t see exactly what they are doing unless you have much time and have the patience to study them of what they are doing and where they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Internet I found this interesting movie. Normally when we see snails on the ground or something we see like one frame of their whole life. We can&#8217;t see exactly what they are doing unless you have much time and have the patience to study them of what they are doing and where they are going. The following movie is a timelapse of snails coming out during the rain and makes you see the snails from a different perspective because. The movie is made by <a title="Think:Chase" href="http://chaserees.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">Chase Rees</a> with a RED One camera.</p>
<p><object style="width: 450px; height: 253px;" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="253" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6535098&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed style="width: 450px; height: 253px;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="253" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6535098&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/film/snail-timelapse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Talk: Login with multiple accounts</title>
		<link>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/internet/google-talk-login-with-multiple-accounts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/internet/google-talk-login-with-multiple-accounts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instant messaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I&#8217;m not very active as you can see, so I want to celebrate this with writing a second-post-of-the-year.
Since a couple of months I&#8217;m using Google Talk a lot more than before. Last week I just wondered if it is possible to run multiple instances of Google Talk. You might think why should I use multiple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="  alignright" title="Google Talk" src="http://www.google.com/talk/images/talk_logo.gif" alt="Google Talk" width="72" height="34" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not very active as you can see, so I want to celebrate this with writing a second-post-of-the-year.</p>
<p>Since a couple of months I&#8217;m using <a title="Google Talk" href="http://www.google.com/talk/" target="_blank">Google Talk</a> a lot more than before. Last week I just wondered if it is possible to run multiple instances of Google Talk. You might think why should I use multiple instances but it becomes handy when you have multiple accounts and you want to be online with both at the same time. It is very simple to do this, you only have start Google Talk with a parameter<em>.</em> To make that easy you can edit your current shortcut to Google Talk or make a new shortcut with the following action (assuming your installation folder is the same):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;C:\Program Files\Google\Google Talk\googletalk.exe&#8221; /nomutex</p>
<p>Now when you run Google Talk using that shortcut and do it a second time, you see a new instance showing up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/internet/google-talk-login-with-multiple-accounts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crashing JavaScript in Internet Explorer</title>
		<link>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/web-development/crashing-javascript-in-internet-explorer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/web-development/crashing-javascript-in-internet-explorer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the JavaScript programmers has probably &#8220;broken&#8221; their scripts in Internet Explorer at least once in their live. Sometimes it is a tiny bug that can crash your scripts. One of that bugs can show up when using object literals.
When adding a few key-value pairs to a object literal, most developers just copy and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the JavaScript programmers has probably &#8220;broken&#8221; their scripts in Internet Explorer at least once in their live. Sometimes it is a tiny bug that can crash your scripts. One of that bugs can show up when using object literals.</p>
<p>When adding a few key-value pairs to a object literal, most developers just copy and past the previous row, including the comma and then edit the key name and its value. Example:</p>

<div class="wp_syntax"><div class="code"><pre class="javascript" style="font-family:monospace;"><span style="color: #003366; font-weight: bold;">var</span> foobars <span style="color: #009900;">&#123;</span>
   foo1<span style="color: #339933;">:</span> <span style="color: #3366CC;">&quot;bar1&quot;</span><span style="color: #339933;">,</span>
   foo2<span style="color: #339933;">:</span> <span style="color: #3366CC;">&quot;bar2&quot;</span><span style="color: #339933;">,</span>
   foo3<span style="color: #339933;">:</span> <span style="color: #3366CC;">&quot;bar3&quot;</span><span style="color: #339933;">,</span> <span style="color: #006600; font-style: italic;">// &lt;-- get rid of that comma!</span>
<span style="color: #009900;">&#125;</span></pre></div></div>

<p>This code will let you crash your JavaScript in Internet Explorer and it can make you desperate when you have to debug it. So, watch out when using object literals. <img src='http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yetanotherblog.nl/web-development/crashing-javascript-in-internet-explorer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
